Wow, chuck monumental go at the new guy who doesn't know how long things take round here with the release date coinciding with the busy season!" ..ie old hands like yourself know the staggered release as you partake here frequently over the years, but how about LOOKING at the post number for the guy & think a bit before lambasting the person, especially in light of the gallery only really taking "staged" shots now I can understand the issue from the perspective of a site user who has put time into jumping through the hoops for submission (if folk really must).
Being new they are also not aware of this forum subsection..
"ZP FORUM Comments & Suggestions
Report your forum-centric complaints, questions or suggestions here"
SO ryan wants constructive critique yes!? ...however a whole subsection of you folk wish to shoot a guy down for posing their dilemma!? ..get a grip, don't shoot them down.
It is precisely this clique that shames the place at times, & anything deemed a slur on ryan's name is treated in the manner of a personal attack.
Various aspects of this sites respawning are seemingly held in stasis or on a seemingly permanent hold, if you don't know you ask, start a thread, the point of discussion, the guy was polite, & his dilemma fitted with the situation & thread.
Some people seem to take this "minion" thing too far at times, more like a cult than a bit of fun.
I encountered the same, & pretty much walked, I would completely understand the posters disdain towards some of you with the untoward remarks, it's not like he was a spammer, hawking ryan's unique creations elsewhere etc etc..
I'm SO ASHAMED of you band-wagoners at times.
Friendly forum, pumpkins, just pumpkins, please adjust your outlook accordingly & remember that subsection..
(4th on down from the top of the list) ..like many users sometimes a thread opens up that runs concurrent & that is why I guess the poster said what they did on the thread.
Based on previous experience though, some of you would have shot him down for perceived "antagonistic" views even if it was in the correct section.
No, i'm not back.